Real answers from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Perplexity · free hand-run scan, no payment · methodology published
Don't take our word that this happens. Open ChatGPT right now and type "the best [what you do] near me." It answers with three to five specific firm names. If yours isn't one of them, that's a shortlist forming without you — and there's no dashboard telling you it's happening.
In a 2025 survey of 500 U.S. households planning to hire an advisor, about 1 in 4 had already used AI in the search. That's the new front door to your market — and unlike Google, you can't see who's walking through it, or which firms it points them to. Enter your site below and a real person runs your prospects' real questions through the engines and emails you the exact answers, free, no payment.
This is a hand-run scan, not an instant grader. A real person — not a bot — runs your questions and emails the answers within one business day. No payment, no call, no signup, no sales list.
This isn't an instant grader. That person runs 2 of your prospects' real questions through ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity by hand and emails you the exact answers — free. We use your email only to send the answers (privacy). Citewise is a hands-on practice — the same person who runs the scan replies at inha.journey@gmail.com and walks you through the paid report on a call. (The example on the right shows what one answer looks like; the paid diagnostic covers 12 questions.)
Several firms are frequently recommended for physicians in the Austin area:
1. Meridian Wealth Partners — flat-fee planning, works extensively with medical professionals…
2. Hill Country Capital — fee-only fiduciary, strong presence on advisor directories…
This is a mock-up so you can see the shape of an answer — the firm names here are invented. The real thing is your free scan: the same kind of answer, but pulled live for your own firm and emailed to you, so the proof is your data, not ours.
What you're actually buying
In a 2025 Wealthtender survey of 500 U.S. households planning to hire an advisor, about 1 in 4 said they'd already used AI in the search — and Gartner projects a 25% drop in traditional search volume by 2028 as buyers shift to AI assistants. Unlike lost Google rankings, there's no dashboard telling you it's happening.
→ 48 raw engine answers, kept in your report. You read exactly what prospects read.
Ranking #1 on Google no longer means you're named in the AI answer — the two draw on different signals, so the playbook your agency runs doesn't transfer, and "add more blog posts" is not an answer.
→ A prioritized 5-action plan naming specific surfaces (directories, comparisons, citations) — hand it to your agency as their work order.
You can't manage what nobody measures twice. One-off audits leave you exactly where you started three months later.
→ The Monitor re-runs the identical measurement monthly and leads with the delta: score movement, questions gained and lost.
After you order
Honest version: this is a human-in-the-loop process, so it runs over a few business days, not hours. Here's every step and where the waits are.
Your intake (site, market, competitors if you have them) attaches to the order automatically. We confirm scope and email you secure payment instructions — within 1 business day, sometimes the same day.
You receive the 12 prospect questions being measured — so you know precisely what you're getting before the report lands.
48 answers, competitor win/loss, action plan, and the paste-ready fix pack — two small files for your website (an llms.txt, a plain-text summary AI tools read, and schema markup, the hidden code that tells search and AI what your firm does) that your web person drops in as-is. The 48-hour clock is measured from payment — miss it and reply "refund," processed within one business day, no questions.
Walk the findings with a human, decide what your team does versus what you delegate. No upsell script.
Same measurement, re-run automatically on your renewal: what moved, who's gaining, what to do this month.
Where this fits
| SEO agency retainer | Enterprise AI-visibility SaaS | Free graders | Citewise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,000–8,000/mo | $500–2,000+/mo, annual contract | $0 | $490 once · $190/mo optional |
| Runs your prospects' actual questions | Rarely | Yes (you configure) | No — site markup only | Yes — generated for your niche |
| Named-competitor win/loss | Sometimes | Some tiers | No | Yes, per answer |
| Ships fixes, not homework | Billable hours | No — dashboards | No | Paste-ready llms.txt + schema |
| Raw answers included | — | Partially | No | All 48, verbatim |
Pricing bands from published rate guides and vendor pages, 2026. If you already run an enterprise tool well, keep it — we're the diagnostic layer for firms that don't need a $12k/yr dashboard.
Pricing
There's no "buy now" button on this page. You send a short intake, we confirm scope and email you a secure payment link within one business day, then the 48-hour delivery clock starts once you pay. We built it this way so every diagnostic is scoped to your firm before you're charged a cent — but if you came expecting to pay and download in one sitting, this is next-business-day-by-email instead. The price is fixed either way: $490, no quote, no negotiation, no sales call required.
$490 one-time
Sends a short intake, not a checkout. We email a payment link within 1 business day.
$190/mo · cancel anytime
Sends a short intake, not a checkout. We email a payment link within 1 business day.
① Report late (>48h from payment)? Reply "refund" to your confirmation email — processed within 1 business day, no questions. ② Factual errors about your firm in the report? Same. ③ If your free scan already shows the engines naming you consistently, we'll say so and tell you not to buy the diagnostic. We'd rather you trust us next quarter than regret us this one.
Read a complete sample report first → · Agencies: white-label program
Who's behind this
Start with the part you can check: the whole pipeline — how questions are generated, how the four engines are captured, and the exact mechanical rule that turns 48 answers into a score — is written out on the methodology page, and every report ships the raw engine answers so you can re-ask any question yourself and verify it. That's deliberate. The person behind Citewise comes from investor relations and corporate development, and now works in the San Francisco AI ecosystem — a background where the job is measurement under scrutiny: build numbers that survive an auditor, say only what you can substantiate, respect disclosure rules rather than route around them. That's the same discipline this product runs on, which is why the scoring is mechanical and re-verifiable, the generated content is factual-only, and we won't write a testimonial or a performance claim for a regulated firm.
It's a new practice, and you should be skeptical of new practices — which is why we don't ask you to take any of the above on trust. Everything that matters is checkable before you pay a cent: the methodology is published in full, the free scan sends you your own live engine answers, every paid report ships the raw answers so you can re-ask any question yourself, and the refund terms are mechanical, not "contact support." When you order, the same person who runs your scan replies from inha.journey@gmail.com and is on your 15-minute readout call — you're talking to the operator, not a queue.
inha.journey@gmail.com — a real person replies within one business day. More about the practice →
Questions
Yes — that's what the free scan at the top of this page is. Enter your site and we run 2 of your prospects' real questions through the engines by hand and email you the exact answers, no payment. The paid diagnostic is the same measurement at 6× the depth (12 questions), plus competitors, the action plan, and the fix pack.
A small, hands-on practice, not a faceless SaaS. The person who runs it spent years in investor relations and corporate development and now works in the San Francisco AI ecosystem. If you're an RIA wondering whether that translates: capital-markets work is the discipline of measuring things auditors and regulators will re-check, saying only what you can substantiate, and respecting disclosure rules — which is exactly the posture this product takes with your SEC-facing content (facts only, no reviews or testimonials, competitor comparisons flagged for your CCO). What you should actually judge it on is the published methodology and the raw engine answers shipped in every report, not the bio. It's deliberately a one-to-few operation, which is why you get a human on the readout call rather than a support queue. Email inha.journey@gmail.com and that person replies, usually within a business day. Right now ordering is deliberately manual — you send an intake and we email you a secure payment link within one business day, then the 48-hour clock starts once you pay. When you use that link, card handling runs through Stripe, so we never see your card number; report delivery is by email. The registered company details are in the privacy policy; the about page has the full story.
Two ways you can check yourself. The free scan sends you the actual engine answers for your firm, so you can re-ask the same question in ChatGPT and compare word for word. Every paid report includes the complete raw engine answers — verbatim, engine by engine — for the same reason. And the methodology page documents the scoring rules, which are mechanical, not editorial.
The free scan exists to prevent that purchase. If the engines already name your firm consistently, we say so and tell you not to buy. If you buy anyway and the report contains factual errors about your firm, the refund is mechanical (reply "refund"). What we don't refund: reports that are accurate but unwelcome.
Because it's software doing the measurement and generation, with a human at the QC gate and on your readout call. Agencies resell this exact kind of diagnostic inside retainers — several white-label ours (partner program).
Short version: most of what you get needs no compliance review — the llms.txt and schema markup are plain facts about your firm (fee model, services, location), which is the same information already on your website. The one thing to run past your CCO first is any page that names a competitor, and we flag exactly those in the report so you know which item needs a look — you're not sending the whole report to compliance. We're not your compliance officer and won't pretend to be, but we're built to keep the review to a minimum. Concretely, here's what we generate so you can judge the risk yourself: (1) measurement — the raw engine answers and a score, which is diagnostic data, not advertising; (2) an llms.txt file and schema markup that state plain facts about your firm (fee model, services, location) — no performance claims, no client outcomes; (3) a 5-action plan of surfaces to improve (directory profiles, factual comparison content, earned citations). We deliberately generate no client reviews, no testimonials, and no endorsements — the categories the SEC marketing rule (206(4)-1) most restricts. Anything we suggest that names a competitor or makes a comparison is flagged in the report as "have compliance review this before publishing," because comparative and substantiation rules apply. Same posture for state-bar advertising rules on the legal side.
No, and nobody honestly can — the engines change with every model update. We guarantee accurate measurement, concrete fixes on the surfaces engines demonstrably cite, and a monthly delta that shows whether it's working.
Scan inputs (domain, questions, answers) are used to build your report. We don't sell data, don't run ads, and card details never touch our servers (Stripe). Deletion requests honored within 30 days — privacy policy.